North America is expected to account for the largest share of the market in 2018. Also, this regional market is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. This can be attributed to the increasing number of transvaginal, transrectal, abdominal, and intraoperative ultrasound procedures; growing number of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and ultrasound-guided interventional procedures (biopsies and venous access); rising adoption of high-level disinfectants; and the presence of leading market players in this region. However, the high cost of automated probe reprocessors and the reluctance to shift from manual disinfection methods to automated probe reprocessors are restraining the growth of this market.
The global Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System market is valued at xx million US$ in 2017 and will reach xx million US$ by the end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of xx% during 2018-2025. The objectives of this study are to define, segment, and project the size of the Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System market based on company, product type, end user and key regions.
This report studies the global market size of Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System in key regions like North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Central & South America and Middle East & Africa, focuses on the consumption of Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System in these regions.
This research report categorizes the global Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System market by top players/brands, region, type and end user. This report also studies the global Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System market status, competition landscape, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, sales channels and distributors.
The following manufacturers are covered in this report, with sales, revenue, market share for each company:
Civco Medical Solutions
Schulke & Mayr
Advanced Sterilization Products
Market size by Product
Market size by End User
Hospitals & Diagnostic Imaging Centers
Ambulatory Care Centers
Academic & Research Institutes
Market size by Region
Central & South America
Rest of Central & South America
Middle East & Africa
The study objectives of this report are:
To study and analyze the global Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System market size (value & volume) by company, key regions, products and end user, breakdown data from 2013 to 2017, and forecast to 2025.
To understand the structure of Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System market by identifying its various subsegments.
To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks).
Focuses on the key global Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System companies, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape and recent development.
To project the value and sales volume of Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System submarkets, with respect to key regions.
To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System are as follows:
History Year: 2013-2017
Base Year: 2017
Estimated Year: 2018
Forecast Year 2018 to 2025
This report includes the estimation of market size for value (million US$) and volume (K Units). Both top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to estimate and validate the market size of Ultrasound Probe Disinfection System market, to estimate the size of various other dependent submarkets in the overall market. Key players in the market have been identified through secondary research, and their market shares have been determined through primary and secondary research. All percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns have been determined using secondary sources and verified primary sources.
For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2017 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.